E-Discovery is
a major source of legal risk and cost—both in the U.S. and abroad.
And clients lack consistent legal guidance, predictable costs, and
defensible solutions.
The vision of Daley & Fey LLP is to help make the “just, speedy
and inexpensive” resolution of disputes a reality. As a boutique
law firm focusing solely on e-discovery, e-records management and
compliance, and data privacy, it is our prime directive.
We know that e-discovery is too expensive. Several firms can
help you do e-discovery damage control. But few can really help
you prevent the damage. Daley & Fey LLP is your trusted advisor,
helping you navigate the complex maze of e-discovery and data privacy.
How do we do it? We believe in a new model.
We focus on results.
We recognize e-discovery problems are business problems. They demand
a business-centric approach — one that we provide.
We replace e-discovery madness with a method.
Our method is simple, yet effective. We assess your legal and regulatory,
information technology and records management landscapes. We identify
gaps in relation to the new federal e-discovery rules, best practices
and emerging case law. And we provide practical recommendations
and solutions.
We won’t leave you orphaned.
We won’t just tell you what you already know – that you have a problem.
Instead, we help you contain costs, ensure compliance and improve
quality today and as technology and e-discovery law evolve.
We listen.
We’ll listen to you carefully, but we won’t tell you what we think
you want to hear. We are confident in our counsel. And we take
pride in providing value.
We’re diverse and experienced.
The Daley & Fey team is diverse in thought and culture. We’ve assembled
a special team of experienced legal, technology and business professionals
that is greater than the sum of its parts.
We are translators.
We are your e-discovery “Rosetta Stone,” because we are multilingual.
We’re fluent in all three required languages: technology, records
management and the law.
|
 |
 |
| Clients need a model that approaches e-discovery
risk and cost as a business problem for which there
is no “silver bullet”…a model that is nimble enough
to defuse new “weapons of mass discovery” …a model
that treats e-discovery as an on-going process and
not just a one-time project…a model that recognizes
the cultural challenges of change involved in any
solution…a model that rewards continuous process
improvement. |
|
|
Presentations
more...
Lisa Lukaszewski:
Speaker, “Social Networking – Managing Access and Information”, ARMA (GKC) (January 13, 2010)
M. James Daley:
Panelist, "Electronic Discovery in Civil Litigation and Cross Border Data Flows – Is it Time
for a Framework of Cooperation?", Across the Divide: Successfully Navigating Safe Harbor – The 2009 Conference
on Cross Border Data Flows & Privacy, Washington DC (November 18, 2009)
M. James Daley:
Speaker, “International E-Discovery: Stranger in a Strange Land”,
13th Annual Electronic Discovery and Records Retention Conference, Chicago (November 6, 2009) and New York (October 8, 2009)
M. James Daley:
Speaker, “Process and Project Management: Are You Ready?”,
13th Annual Electronic Discovery and Records Retention Conference, Chicago (November 5, 2009) and New York (October 7, 2009)
Publications
more...
M. James Daley:
Co-Author,
“Seventh
Circuit Puts Legs on the Sedona Conference® Corporation Proclamation,”
Georgetown Law E-Discovery Blog, posted November 6, 2009.
M. James Daley and Laura Fey:
Co-Authors, “International Restrictions on Releasing Personal Information - What
Steps Your Company Needs to Consider,”
The Corporate Counselor, Volume 24, No. 6, October 2009.
M. James Daley:
Co-Editor-in-Chief, “The Sedona Conference®
Framework for Analysis Of Cross-Border Discovery
Conflicts: A Practical Guide To Navigating
The Competing Currents Of International
Data Privacy And E-Discovery,” August 2008.
Laura Clark Fey:
Co-Author, "A
Brave New World: The Dawn of Hyper-Complex
Litigation - How the influx of imported
products, the rise of cross-border and multinational
litigation, and diminished injury requirements
mean big products liability headaches for
manufacturers in the years to come," Bloomberg
Law Reports: Litigation, Volume 2, No. 27,
July 7, 2008.
|
|